Smooth operations: Reimagining the order management process

Running streamlined operations in an acquisition-driven industry is a challenge—especially when product innovation is a top priority. That's what this medical devices leader discovered. Conflicting operating models and technology infrastructures were not combining well, and the company urgently needed a more scalable, efficient way of conducting business. We helped the client harness Lean DigitalSM, and transform its operating model for impact. The result: future-ready operations on track to deliver over $45 million in business impact by boosting cash flow, revenue, and productivity.

Challenge

Reconcile disorderly data, refurbish the back office

When a company can’t identify clients, respond to feedback, or address complaints, customer relationships suffer. Yet all too often, this firm’s mixed bag of technology didn’t distinguish between buyers, users, and payers, because its field service management software, ERP, and CRM all captured information differently.

The enterprise also lacked effective customer segmentation tools. That had to change in 2016, when the enterprise hoped to accelerate growth and expand margins by shifting its product portfolio and restructuring operations to better align with its customers. But undertaking that kind of transformation demanded a back office that could drive scalability, foster sales and service, and bump up margins.

Solution

Build a framework for success

We helped enable Intelligent Operations^SM, a rapidly attainable, yet scalable business platform built to adapt while generating growth, cost efficiency, and business agility. We began by assessing key processes and systems using a four dimensional framework across customer experience, sales experience, complexity, and risk (CSCR). That helped us define target business outcomes—and to focus on areas that would deliver the most impact. The customer and sales frameworks provided a way to measure the experience of the end customer and to distinguish it from service delivery or the order-to-cash process. Meanwhile, we put the complexity and risk frameworks to work designing a target operating model and finetuning customer segmentation. Some important insights that emerged from the CSCR analysis:

• 30% of customer complaints were due to poor master data management. Another 20% were due to wrong information about deals. Both resulted in poor customer engagement.
• Nearly $12 million in orders were on hold monthly because of the company’s manual contract management process. What’s more, almost 50% required rework. And that hampered the sales experience.
• 40% of purchase orders (PO) failed validation checks and no POs existed for 20% of billable service orders because management protocols weren’t standardized.
• Nearly $300,000 in orders were cancelled monthly. Plus, it was hard to calculate the lead time needed to fulfill orders and meet commitments because of poor visibility in order management.

The analysis called for short- and long-term improvements to business processes. We identified order management as the best place to start for instant impact. We also recognized a real need to transform service calls management and customer care processes, but saw those as value generators over the longer term.

An initial diagnosis revealed several non-standard order management protocols, such as incorrect invoicing, inaccurate inventory reporting, discrepancies in deal pricing, and wrong shipping details. As a result, nearly $12 million in orders were on hold every month. We are setting up a rigorous order management system with multi-level interventions to resolve issues quickly and smoothly. To improve order entry accuracy, we established baselines and thresholds for audit sampling to minimize people, process, and IT errors. With more effective monitoring using ERP, we improved inventory accuracy and reduced lead time. All this drove ownership at the plant level and set up a framework for operational governance.

We established a governance framework that forces the system to validate every service call with a purchase order. In addition, the framework makes every service call billable —therefore ensuring each service call produces revenue. We’re also evaluating a mobile app that allows customers to authorize POs in real time so field service teams don’t lose out on revenue opportunities.

The customer care team frequently put off assigning service calls because it couldn’t always predict when field service teams were available —and that affected the end customer. So we created a regularly updated central repository defining standard operating procedures and made sure everyone in all regions understood these procedures. The repository delivers information on the availability, location, and skill sets of field service teams.

Existing customer satisfaction surveys (CSATs) weren’t measuring emotional quotients accurately and —to complicate matters further— each region rolled out CSATs differently. What’s more, the company captured only 8% of customer feedback, so acting on it was a challenge. Genpact is helping the client redesign its CSAT survey framework and drive uniform adoption across operating units. We’re also working with the company to build models capable of analyzing data to calculate customer emotion quotients and to establish a new baseline. The goal: improving CSAT scores by replicating best practices and bridging process gaps.

Alongside all this, Genpact is helping the client integrate its technology and design its future state target operating model through robotic process automation and Genpact Systems of Engagement^SM.

Impact

Revenue on the rise and a future-ready firm

The transformation is already improving cash flow, upping income, minimizing revenue leaks, and boosting productivity. In addition, several existing processes are now prepared to unlock additional value through robotic process automation. Over the course of Genpact's engagement, this company can expect:

• $36 million in cash flow impact
• $3 million through revenue enhancement
• $5 million boost to revenues by minimizing leakage, and
• $1 million in savings from productivity enhancements

That’s $45 million. That’s impact.